....it's hard to see through, and good ol' Gulf Coast home boys like me should
not mess around with it.

Christmas Eve I was flying my daughter and grandson to Houston to visit my
mom for the holiday. We'd spent the previous day in a little town NE of
Houston. It was only about a 45 nm flight from 6R3 to Houston Hobby and good
VFR was reported and forecast, so I didn't file IFR. There was a mention
of -SN in the Hobby TAF, but heck, the ceiling was 7,000 and the vis. was 10,
so no worries, right?

Houston Approach cleared me into the Bravo and vectored me down the east side
of the county at 2,000', clear of the approaches into IAH. Over that stretch
I talked to four different TRACON frequencies.

Southeast of Hobby, the last controller for some reason had me climb from
2,000 to 2,200, saying "advise if unable." Hmm. Shortly thereafter, the
vis. started to fall as he vectored me west to put me south of Hobby, and I
had to request lower to maintain VFR. It was snowing. Another vector to the
north headed us directly towards Hobby and now the low-vis. was rapidly
becoming no-vis. As I descended to 1,500' to try to maintain VFR, I could
see the ground fine below us but I had serious doubts that I was still
legally in VMC. The controller had already instructed me to report the
airport in sight, and now he called back, sounding a little exasperated
saying, "Cessna '87Delta, airport 12 o'clock, 3 miles." Big ol' Hobby
Airport, and I couldn't see it.

Just as I hit the PTT to 'fess up and ask for a local IFR clearance, the
airport appeared, almost under my right wing. I was in good shape for long
right base to RWY 4, which is what I had been expecting, and I told the
controller I had the airport. He handed me to the tower and the landing was
uneventful.

I'm pretty mad at myself for letting this situation go as far as it did.
What fooled me most, I think, was the fact that I had been watching regional
METARs all day reporting -SN but still having vis. of 10 miles. A little
snow? No problem! This is Houston, not Minneapolis--how bad could it get?
Pretty bad, actually: the area south of Hobby was having much heavier
snowfall and it quickly knocked the vis. down to very marginal VMC at best.
Angleton, south of Houston, got 7 inches of snow that evening.

So I've learned some more lessons, I hope: 1) Do not be optimistic about
conditions involving precip., no matter what the forecast says. 2) When
things start going sour, make a new plan RIGHT NOW and tell the controller
what you need, don't passively follow vectors. 3) And (bringing back my old
personal rule) *always* file IFR cross country unless there is a very good
reason not to.
--
Dan
C-172RG at BFM

"Dan Luke" > wrote in message
...
> ...it's hard to see through, and good ol' Gulf Coast home boys like me
> should
> not mess around with it.

Edifying story, Dan! Glad it worked out.

> Southeast of Hobby, the last controller for some reason had me climb from
> 2,000 to 2,200, saying "advise if unable." Hmm. Shortly thereafter, the
> vis. started to fall as he vectored me west to put me south of Hobby, and
> I
> had to request lower to maintain VFR. It was snowing.

I'm a little unclear as to how descending could improve your visibility in
snowfall. I see how you could get a better view of the ground, but the
VFR/IFR distinction is primarily for aircraft separation rather than
navigation, and is thus defined in terms of flight visibility, not ground
visibility.

I too have encountered worse-than-forecast visibility, to the point of
finding IMC in place of expected good VMC. It's not just a problem with snow
or other precipitation. (Once, it was a matter of smoke from forest fires in
Canada descending through the lower atmosphere in the vicinity of New York
City!) I don't always file IFR for XCs, but I do make sure to have a backup
plan in case of any remotely-plausible IMC.

--Gary

"Gary Drescher" wrote:
> I'm a little unclear as to how descending could improve your
> visibility in snowfall.

IOW, I couldn't think of anything else to do. :(

At least I could see the ground underneath me!

--
Dan
C172RG at BFM

What reason did you give the controller for your descent? If it was to
maintain VFR, he shouldn't have been surprised that you could not see the
airport.

I can never read too many stories like yours--thanks for posting. Glad you
had the IR giving you the IFR pop-up in your back pocket.

Marco Leon


"Dan Luke" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Gary Drescher" wrote:
> > I'm a little unclear as to how descending could improve your
> > visibility in snowfall.
>
> IOW, I couldn't think of anything else to do. :(
>
> At least I could see the ground underneath me!
>
> --
> Dan
> C172RG at BFM
>
>

Thank you for sharing your experience! Who along the Gulf Coast expects
they'll ever fly through snow?

"Dan Luke" > wrote in message
...
> ...it's hard to see through, and good ol' Gulf Coast home boys like me
should
> not mess around with it.
>
> Christmas Eve I was flying my daughter and grandson to Houston to visit my
> mom for the holiday. We'd spent the previous day in a little town NE of
> Houston. It was only about a 45 nm flight from 6R3 to Houston Hobby and
good
> VFR was reported and forecast, so I didn't file IFR. There was a mention
> of -SN in the Hobby TAF, but heck, the ceiling was 7,000 and the vis. was
10,
> so no worries, right?
>
> Houston Approach cleared me into the Bravo and vectored me down the east
side
> of the county at 2,000', clear of the approaches into IAH. Over that
stretch
> I talked to four different TRACON frequencies.
>
> Southeast of Hobby, the last controller for some reason had me climb from
> 2,000 to 2,200, saying "advise if unable." Hmm. Shortly thereafter, the
> vis. started to fall as he vectored me west to put me south of Hobby, and
I
> had to request lower to maintain VFR. It was snowing. Another vector to
the
> north headed us directly towards Hobby and now the low-vis. was rapidly
> becoming no-vis. As I descended to 1,500' to try to maintain VFR, I could
> see the ground fine below us but I had serious doubts that I was still
> legally in VMC. The controller had already instructed me to report the
> airport in sight, and now he called back, sounding a little exasperated
> saying, "Cessna '87Delta, airport 12 o'clock, 3 miles." Big ol' Hobby
> Airport, and I couldn't see it.
>
> Just as I hit the PTT to 'fess up and ask for a local IFR clearance, the
> airport appeared, almost under my right wing. I was in good shape for
long
> right base to RWY 4, which is what I had been expecting, and I told the
> controller I had the airport. He handed me to the tower and the landing
was
> uneventful.
>
> I'm pretty mad at myself for letting this situation go as far as it did.
> What fooled me most, I think, was the fact that I had been watching
regional
> METARs all day reporting -SN but still having vis. of 10 miles. A little
> snow? No problem! This is Houston, not Minneapolis--how bad could it
get?
> Pretty bad, actually: the area south of Hobby was having much heavier
> snowfall and it quickly knocked the vis. down to very marginal VMC at
best.
> Angleton, south of Houston, got 7 inches of snow that evening.
>
> So I've learned some more lessons, I hope: 1) Do not be optimistic about
> conditions involving precip., no matter what the forecast says. 2) When
> things start going sour, make a new plan RIGHT NOW and tell the controller
> what you need, don't passively follow vectors. 3) And (bringing back my
old
> personal rule) *always* file IFR cross country unless there is a very good
> reason not to.
> --
> Dan
> C-172RG at BFM
>
>

"Marco Leon" wrote:
> What reason did you give the controller for your descent? If it was to
> maintain VFR, he shouldn't have been surprised that you could not see the
> airport.

I told him it was to maintain VFR. I think he must have suspected that
conditions were deteriorating, based on his "if able" statement earlier when
he told me to climb to 2,200'.
--
Dan
C-172RG at BFM